Aplicação da técnica de vinheta em estudos sobre processos decisórios<p>Application of the vignette technique in studies on decision-making processes
Keywords:
Decisão, Vinheta, Revisão IntegrativaAbstract
Uma das técnicas para levantar dados sobre o fenômeno dos julgamentos humanos é a vinheta que seria a criação de cenários hipotéticos. O presente trabalho tem o objetivo de realizar uma revisão integrativa a fim de identificar como a técnica de vinheta vem sendo aplicada nos estudos sobre processos decisórios organizacionais. Nesse sentido, realizou-se um levantamento bibliográfico dos últimos 5 anos via Scopus. Ao todo 17 estudos foram identificados por aplicarem a técnica no contexto da tomada de decisão. Os resultados apontam que técnica vem sendo aplicada nos estudos sobre processos decisórios organizacionais, principalmente, nas decisões relacionadas à cadeia de suprimentos e com forte presença de testes estatísticos e controles adicionais para verificar a validade interna e externa, bem como, a presença de vieses. A principal contribuição é indicar caminhos para o desenvolvimento de novos estudos que apliquem técnicas menos convencionais.
References
AGUINIS, Herman; BRADLEY, Kyle J. Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational research methods, v. 17, n. 4, p. 351-371, 2014.
ALEXANDER, Cheryl S.; BECKER, Henry Jay. The use of vignettes in survey research. Public opinion quarterly, v. 42, n. 1, p. 93-104, 1978.
AMOS, Clinton et al. Blinded by the light? Analyzing sustainability authenticity, customer service perceptions, and halo effects. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2018.
ARIELY, Dan; JONES, Simon. Predictably irrational. New York: HarperCollins, 2008.
BARDLN, Lawrence. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: edições, v. 70, p. 225, 1977.
BAZERMAN, Charles. Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literacy studies. Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning, p. 53-65, 2004.
BELHADI, Amine et al. Behavioral mechanisms influencing sustainable supply chain governance decision-making from a dyadic buyer-supplier perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 236, p. 108136, 2021.
BLAJER-GOŁĘBIEWSKA, Anna. Individual corporate reputation and perception of collective corporate reputation regarding stock market investments. Plos one, v. 16, n. 9, p. e0257323, 2021.
BODE, Christiane; ROGAN, Michelle; SINGH, Jasjit. Up to No Good? Gender, Social Impact Work, and Employee Promotions. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 67, n. 1, p. 82-130, 2022.
BOTELHO, Louise Lira Roedel; DE ALMEIDA CUNHA, Cristiano Castro; MACEDO, Marcelo. O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e sociedade, v. 5, n. 11, p. 121-136, 2011.
CHAE, Sangho et al. To insource or outsource the sourcing? A behavioral investigation of the multi-tier sourcing decision. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2019.
COZBY, P. (2003). Métodos de pesquisa em ciências do comportamento. São Paulo: Atlas.
DE CAMPOS SERRA, Bernardo Paraiso; TOMEI, Patrícia Amélia; SERRA, Fernando António Ribeiro. A pesquisa em tomada de decisão estratégica no alto escalão: evolução e base intelectual do tema. Revista de Ciências da Administração, v. 16, n. 40, p. 11-28, 2014.
EVANS, Spencer C. et al. Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. International journal of clinical and health psychology, v. 15, n. 2, p. 160-170, 2015.
FINCH, Janet; MASON, Jennifer. Obligations of kinship in contemporary Britain: is there normative agreement?. British Journal of Sociology, p. 345-367, 1991.
FINGER, Michael S.; RAND, Kevin L. Addressing validity concerns in clinical psychology research. Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology, p. 13-30, 2003.
FOERSTL, Kai; FRANKE, Henrik; CATALDO, Zelal. What drives managers to insource production? Evidence from a behavioural experiment. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, v. 27, n. 4, p. 100715, 2021.
FRANCESCHINI, Ana Carolina Trousdell; FERREIRA, Diogo Conque Seco. Economia comportamental: Uma introdução para analistas do comportamento. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, v. 46, n. 2, p. 317-325, 2012.
FRANKE, Henrik; FOERSTL, Kai; HEESE, H. Sebastian. The interaction effect of goal misalignment and metaknowledge distribution on team decision making in operations and supply chain management. Decision Sciences, v. 52, n. 2, p. 331-361, 2021.
HSU, Yu‐Lin; REID, Gavin C. Two‐stage decision‐making within the firm: Analysis and case studies. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 42, n. 6, p. 1355-1373, 2021.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American economic review, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1449-1475, 2003.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, v. 51, n. 2, p. 296-312, 1992.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel; SIBONY, Olivier; SUNSTEIN, C. R. Noise. HarperCollins UK, 2022.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2011)
KAHNEMAN, Daniel; TVERSKY, Amos. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, v. 39, n. 4, p. 341-350, 1984.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel.; TVERSKY, Amos. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, nº 47, 263-291, 1979.
KAMPHUIS, Pascal; GLEBBEEK, Arie C. Job (in) security and workers' training decisions: A framing approach. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), v. 7, n. 3, p. 361-387, 2020.
KIRSCHBAUM, Charles; HOELZ, José Carlos. A confiança em situações ambivalentes e incongruentes: a utilização de vinhetas como método exploratório. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 15, p. 42-68, 2014.
KRAUS, Sascha et al. In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study. Review of Managerial Science, v. 12, n. 4, p. 1025-1053, 2018.
KUSHNICK, Geoff. Access to resources shapes maternal decision-making evidence from a factorial vignette experiment. PloS one, v. 8, n. 9, p. e75539, 2013.
MARTIN, Kirsten; WALDMAN, Ari. Are Algorithmic Decisions Legitimate? The Effect of Process and Outcomes on Perceptions of Legitimacy of AI Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-18, 2022.
MEDER, Anthony A.; SCHWARTZ, Steven; YOUNG, Richard. Bandits and bounties: the intersection of information search and investment decisions. Accounting Research Journal, 2019.
MULLAINATHAN, S; THALER, R. Behavioral Economics. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Working Paper No. 7948. 2000.
NEUMANN, Franziska; WULF, Torsten. Intercultural differences in issue interpretation: Effects of emotions and framing. European Management Journal, v. 40, n. 2, p. 182-193, 2022.
PARK, Camila Lee; NUNES, Mauro Fracarolli; ISHIZAKA, Alessio. End-to-end sustainability: trade-offs, consumers’ perceptions and decisions beyond B2C interfaces. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2021
PATINO, Cecilia Maria; FERREIRA, Juliana Carvalho. Internal and external validity: can you apply research study results to your patients?. Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia, v. 44, p. 183-183, 2018.
RAMOS, Simone Cristina; TAKAHASHI, Adriana Roseli Wünsch; ROGLIO, Karina De Déa. Análise da produção nacional sobre processo decisório no período de 2004-2014. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 2015.
ROSENTHAL, R. Covert communication in the psychological experiment. Psychological Bulletin, 67, p. 356-367, 1967
SANTANA, Weslei Gusmão Piau; GOMES, Almiralva Ferraz. processo decisório e racionalidade em redes de pequenas empresas: uma agenda para pesquisa. ENCONTRO DE ESTUDOS SOBRE EMPREENDEDORISMO E GESTÃO DE MICRO E PEQUENAS EMPRESAS, v. 5, 2008.
SBICCA, Adriana. Heurísticas no estudo das decisões econômicas: contribuições de Herbert Simon, Daniel Kahneman e Amos Tversky. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), v. 44, p. 579-603, 2014.
SIMON, Herbert A. Rational decision making in business organizations. The American economic review, v. 69, n. 4, p. 493-513, 1979.
SCHOENBERG, Nancy E.; RAVDAL, Hege. Using vignettes in awareness and attitudinal research. International journal of social research methodology, v. 3, n. 1, p. 63-74, 2000.
TAYLOR, Kelsey M.; HAJMOHAMMAD, Sara; VACHON, Stephan. Activist engagement and industry-level change: Adoption of new practices by observing firms. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 92, p. 295-306, 2021.
TETTEGAH, Sharon; BAILEY, Brian P.; TAYLOR, Kona. Clover: Narratives and simulations in virtual environments. The Journal of Negro Education, p. 43-56, 2007.
THALER, R. H.; SUNSTEIN, C. R. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. In: Amsterdam Law Forum. 2008.
THOMAS, Rodney et al. Decomposing social sustainability: Signaling theory insights into supplier selection decisions. Journal of Supply Chain Management, v. 57, n. 4, p. 117-136, 2021.
TORRACO, Richard J. Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human resource development review, v. 4, n. 3, p. 356-367, 2005.
TVERSKY, Amos; KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. science, v. 185, n. 4157, p. 1124-1131, 1974.
TVERSKY, Amos; KAHNEMAN, Daniel. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. In: Behavioral decision making. Springer, Boston, MA, 1985. p. 25-41.
VALENTINE, Sean; FLEISCHMAN, Gary. From schoolyard to workplace: The impact of bullying on sales and business employees' Machiavellianism, job satisfaction, and perceived importance of an ethical issue. Human Resource Management, v. 57, n. 1, p. 293-305, 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Definitions. The following terms shall be used as Agreement for this submission.
Notice: As part of the process for submission, the authors are obliged to verify the submission conformity in relation to all items listed in this requirement. The submissions which are not in accordance with the rules will be sending back to the authors.
1. It is stated that are the exclusive owners and holders of copyrights and content submitted to be published and in this sense agree with free of rights which get the first edition to the publisher and publication to the publishing house of Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste – Publishing UNICENTRO, by means of Capital Científico Journal with the work licensed at the same time under Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing the content sharing with the recognition of the authorship and initial publication of this Journal.
In this way, the author (authors) authorizes (they authorize) that Publishing UNICENTRO, through the Capital Científico Journal (Electronic-On Line or Printed) the publication of this content by printed and electronic, also for communication to the public, including the public exhibition, reproduction by any process, distribution, and others systems of display or exposure to public, by any ways, medias and supports.
2. It is declared that the responsibility by the originality of the work, and it is declared that its content was not published partially or in parts by a second journal, as well is not being considered for publication in another journal or publisher in any form of media. The authors are responsible by the information accuracy as well the data contained in the submitted content.
3. It is declared that in the text process of writing it was observed with accuracy the rules referred to citations and references to research sources used, according to the Brazilian law 9.610/ 1988 (law of Author’s rights) as well as it was observed the dispositions contained in the Committee and Ethic reference to the object researched.
4. It is declared that the authors rights was acquired reserved to the indirect owners when in the in the work there are remissions, translations, collections, inserted photos and images, which the property is not owned by the authors, as well as, authorizations with the direct owners or titular from registered, names of organizations or companies that are mentioned.
5. It is declared and that authors are obliged to indemnify UNICENTRO or its publishers, in the case of suffering any material or moral injury in consequence of the law or extra law acts promoted by third ones in reason of its publication departing from the published work.
